CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Shock Team Approach in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Proof of Concept SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019 Systems of Care for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association Large-Bore Radial Access for Complex PCI: A Flash of COLOR With Some Shades of Grey Effects of Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus Randomized Comparison Between Radial and Femoral Large-Bore Access for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Application of High-Sensitivity Troponin in Suspected Myocardial Infarction Coronary Angiography after Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation Association of Coronary Anatomical Complexity With Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program Mechanisms and diagnostic evaluation of persistent or recurrent angina following percutaneous coronary revascularization

Original Research2018 Jan 25. [Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL:J Interv Cardiol. Article Link

Long-term outcomes of rotational atherectomy of underexpanded stents. A single center experience

Hernández-Enríquez M, Campelo-Parada F, Lhermusier T et al. Keywords: outcomes; rotational atherectomy; stentablation; underexpanded stents

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES - To analyze the procedural and long-term outcomes of the use of rotational atherectomy (RA) in underexpanded stents in our cohort and to provide an overview of currently available data on this technique.


BACKGROUND - Stent underexpansion (SU) has been related to stent thrombosis and restenosis. RA has been used to treat undilatable SU as a bail-out strategy with encouraging results.


METHODS - This is an observational, single-center study. We included patients who underwent stentablation between 2013 and 2017. Baseline demographics, procedural results, in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and long-term follow-up MACE were retrospectively collected.


RESULTS - A total of 11 patients (90.9% males, mean age 65.4 ± 18.6) were included in this study. Median left ventricle ejection fraction was 53.5% [46.2-55]. Median calculated Syntax score was 16 [9-31] and 45.5% of patients were admitted for acute coronary syndrome. Radial approach was used in 63.6% of cases. Most patients only required one burr (45% used a 1.5 mm diameter burr) during the intervention. Procedural success was achieved in 90.9% of the cases. Acute lumen gain was 42.7% [30.7-61.49]. There were no in-hospital deaths or MACE. At a median follow-up of 26 months, only one patient (9.1%) suffered MACE in the context of acute coronary syndrome, and two patients (18.2%) required non-target lesion revascularization. No deaths were reported.


CONCLUSIONS - RA of under expanded stents is a feasible option with a high rate of procedural success. At long-term follow-up, all of them were alive and 90.9% of patients remained free from MACE.


© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Interventional Cardiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.