CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves clinical outcomes during implantation of both first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents Discrepancies in Measurement of the Thoracic Aorta: JACC Review Topic of the Week 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk Prognostic implications of baseline 6‐min walk test performance in intermediate risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement Economic and Quality-of-Life Outcomes of Natriuretic Peptide–Guided Therapy for Heart Failure Chimney technique in a TAVR-in-TAVR procedure with high risk of left main artery ostium occlusion Colchicine Reduces Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Coronary Disease From organic and inorganic phosphates to valvular and vascular calcifications

Original Research2021 Feb 2;S1936-8798(20)32281-0.

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Online Quantitative Aortographic Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation After TAVR: Results of the OVAL Study

R Modolo, M van Mourik, PW Serruys et al. Keywords: TAVR; aortic regurgitation; paravalvular leak

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - Quantitative assessment of regurgitation after TAVR through aortography using videodensitometry is simple, reproducible, and validated in vitro, in vivo, in clinical trials, and in real-worldpatients. However, thus far the assessment has been done offline.

 

METHODS - This was a single center, prospective, proof-of-principle, feasibility study. One hundred consecutive patients with aortic stenosis and indications to undergo TAVR were enrolled. All final aortograms were analyzed immediately after acquisition in the catheterization laboratory and were also sent to an independent core laboratory for blinded offline assessment. The primary endpoint of the study was the feasibility of the online assessment of regurgitation (percentage of analyzable cases). The secondary endpoint was the reproducibility of results between the online assessment and the offline analysis by the core laboratory.

 

RESULTS - Patientsmean age was 81 ± 7 years, and 56% were men. The implanted valves were either SAPIEN 3 (97%) or SAPIEN 3 Ultra (3%). The primary endpoint of online feasibility of analysis was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86% to 97%) which was the same feasibility encountered by the core laboratory (92%; 95% CI: 86% to 97%). Reproducibility assessment showed a high correlation between online and core laboratory evaluations (R2 = 0.87, p < 0.001), with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.962 (95% CI: 0.942 to 0.975; p < 0.001).

 

CONCLUSIONS - This study showed high feasibility of online quantitative assessment of regurgitation and high agreement between the online examiner and core laboratory. These results may pave the way for the application of videodensitometry in the catheterization laboratory after TAVR. (Online Videodensitometric Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation in the Cath-Lab [OVAL]; NCT04047082)