CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Dual Antiplatelet TherapyIs It Time to Cut the Cord With Aspirin? Patterns of calcification in coronary artery disease. A statistical analysis of intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography in 1155 lesions von Willebrand Factor and Management of Heart Valve Disease: JACC Review Topic of the Week Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality Impact of Percutaneous Revascularization on Exercise Hemodynamics in Patients With Stable Coronary Disease Adenosine and adenosine receptor-mediated action in coronary microcirculation Relationship Between Hospital Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Volume and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes Pulmonary artery denervation for treatment of a patient with pulmonary hypertension secondary to left heart disease 2019 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With High Blood Pressure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures Ascending Aortic Length and Risk of Aortic Adverse Events: The Neglected Dimension

Original Research2021 Mar 9.

JOURNAL:Diabetes Obes Metab. Article Link

Red Cell Distribution Width in Patients with Diabetes and Myocardial Infarction: an analysis from the EXAMINE trial

JP Ferreira, Z Lamiral, G Bakris et al. Keywords: alogliptin; outcomes; red cell distribution width; T2DM

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a measure of size variability in the red blood cell population (anisocytosis). Increased RDW may arise from any condition that affects erythropoiesis or the survival of erythrocytes. RDW has been associated with poor prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Whether RDW is a risk marker for adverse cardiovascular outcomes or also a marker of noncardiovascular health concerns is of clinical importance.

 

AIMS - To determine the clinical correlates of increased RDW, its potential mechanistic association with multiple circulating biomarkers, and its prognostic value, in patients with (T2D) who had a recent acute coronary syndrome.

 

METHODS - We used timeupdated Cox models applied to patients enrolled in the EXAMINE (Examination of Cardiovascular Outcomes with Alogliptin versus Standard of Care) trial.

 

RESULTS - A total of 5380 patients were included, the median age was 61 years and 32% were women. Patients with higher RDW were older, more frequently women, with longer duration of diabetes duration, and increased comorbidities. An RDW >16.1% (both baseline and timeupdated) was independently associated with the study primary composite outcome of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke or cardiovascular death (timeupdated adjusted HR =1.36, 95%CI =1.161.61, p < 0.001), allcause death (timeupdated adjusted HR =2.01, 95%CI =1.602.53, p < 0.001), as well as mortality from nonCV causes (timeupdated adjusted HR =2.67, 95%CI =1.724.15, p < 0.001). RDW had a weaktomoderate correlation with hemoglobin and circulating markers that reflected inflammation, apoptosis, fibrosis and congestion. Alogliptin did not alter RDW values.

 

CONCLUSIONS - RDW is a marker of disease severity associated with a multitude of poor outcomes, including both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular death. RDW correlated modestly with inflammatory, proapoptotic, profibrotic, and congestion markers, and its levels were not affected by alogliptin during the course of the trial.

 

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.