CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Online Quantitative Aortographic Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation After TAVR: Results of the OVAL Study Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Relation between baseline plaque features and subsequent coronary artery remodeling determined by optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound Considerations for Optimal Device Selection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review Stage-dependent differential effects of interleukin-1 isoforms on experimental atherosclerosis Long-term outcome of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement 2021 ACC/AHA Key Data Elements and Definitions for Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Data Standards for Heart Failure) Impact of Lesion Preparation Strategies on Outcomes of Left Main PCI: The EXCEL Trial

Original Research2021 Apr, 14 (8) 859–872

JOURNAL:JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions Article Link

Prospective Evaluation of Transseptal TMVR for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses: MITRAL Trial Valve-in-Valve Arm 1-Year Outcomes

M Guerrero , A Pursnani , A Narang et al. Keywords: transseptal MViV; high-risk patients

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES - The aim of this study was to assess 1-year clinical outcomes among high-risk patients with failed surgical mitral bioprostheses who underwent transseptal mitral valve-in-valve (MViV) with the SAPIEN 3 aortic transcatheter heart valve (THV) in the MITRAL (Mitral Implantation of Transcatheter Valves) trial.

 

BACKGROUND - The MITRAL trial is the first prospective study evaluating transseptal MViV with the SAPIEN 3 aortic THV in high-risk patients with failed surgical mitral bioprostheses.

 

METHODS - High-risk patients with symptomatic moderate to severe or severe mitral regurgitation (MR) or severe mitral stenosis due to failed surgical mitral bioprostheses were prospectively enrolled. The primary safety endpoint was technical success. The primary THV performance endpoint was absence of MR grade 2+ or mean mitral valve gradient 10 mm Hg (30 days and 1 year). Secondary endpoints included procedural success and all-cause mortality (30 days and 1 year).

 

RESULTS - Thirty patients were enrolled between July 2016 and October 2017 (median age 77.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 70.3 to 82.8 years], 63.3% women, median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 9.4% [IQR: 5.8% to 12.0%], 80% in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV). The technical success rate was 100%. The primary performance endpoint in survivors was achieved in 96.6% (28 of 29) at 30 days and 82.8% (24 of 29) at 1 year. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 3.3% and was unchanged at 1 year. The only death was due to airway obstruction after swallowing several pills simultaneously 29 days post-MViV. At 1-year follow-up, 89.3% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, the median mean mitral valve gradient was 6.6 mm Hg (interquartile range: 5.5 to 8.9 mm Hg), and all patients had MR grade 1+.