CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Application of High-Sensitivity Troponin in Suspected Myocardial Infarction Effects of Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus Randomized Comparison Between Radial and Femoral Large-Bore Access for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Coronary Angiography after Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation Post-Stroke Cardiovascular Complications and Neurogenic Cardiac Injury: JACC State-of-the-Art Review Management of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complications: Algorithms From the 2018 and 2019 Seattle Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complications Conference European Bifurcation Club White Paper on Stenting Techniques for Patients With Bifurcated Coronary Artery Lesions Predicting Major Adverse Events in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction COVID-19 and Thrombotic or Thromboembolic Disease: Implications for Prevention, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Follow-up

Original Research20 July 2021

JOURNAL:Ann Intern Med. Article Link

Frailty and Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation: A Cohort Study

DH Kim, A Pawar, JJ Gagne et al. Keywords: DOACs vs. warfarin; AF; dabigatran; rivaroxaban; apixaban

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - The role of differing levels of frailty in the choice of oral anticoagulants for older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE - To examine the outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin by frailty levels.

DESIGN - 1:1 propensity scorematched analysis of Medicare data, 2010 to 2017.

SETTING - Community.

PATIENTS - Medicare beneficiaries with AF who initiated use of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or warfarin.

MEASUREMENTS - Composite end point of death, ischemic stroke, or major bleeding by frailty levels, defined by a claims-based frailty index.

RESULTS - In the dabigatranwarfarin cohort (n = 158 730; median follow-up, 72 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 63.5 for dabigatran initiators and 65.6 for warfarin initiators (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.05]; rate difference [RD], 2.2 [CI, 6.5 to 2.1]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.81 (CI, 0.68 to 0.97), 0.98 (CI, 0.90 to 1.08), and 1.09 (CI, 0.96 to 1.23), respectively. In the rivaroxabanwarfarin cohort (n = 275 944; median follow-up, 82 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 77.8 for rivaroxaban initiators and 83.7 for warfarin initiators (HR, 0.98 [CI, 0.94 to 1.02]; RD, 5.9 [CI, 9.4 to 2.4]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.88 (CI, 0.77 to 0.99), 1.04 (CI, 0.98 to 1.10), and 0.96 (CI, 0.89 to 1.04), respectively. In the apixabanwarfarin cohort (n = 218 738; median follow-up, 84 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 60.1 for apixaban initiators and 92.3 for warfarin initiators (HR, 0.68 [CI, 0.65 to 0.72]; RD, 32.2 [CI, 36.1 to 28.3]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.61 (CI, 0.52 to 0.71), 0.66 (CI, 0.61 to 0.70), and 0.73 (CI, 0.67 to 0.80), respectively.

LIMITATIONS - Residual confounding and lack of clinical frailty assessment.

CONCLUSION - For older adults with AF, apixaban was associated with lower rates of adverse events across all frailty levels. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with lower event rates only among nonfrail patients.