CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Long-term safety and effectiveness of unprotected left main coronary stenting with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents Left main coronary angioplasty: early and late results of 127 acute and elective procedures Unprotected Left Main Disease: Indications and Optimal Strategies for Percutaneous Intervention Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation Influence of Heart Rate on FFR Measurements: An Experimental and Clinical Validation Study Impact of myocardial supply area on the transstenotic hemodynamics as determined by fractional flow reserve Validation of bifurcation DEFINITION criteria and comparison of stenting strategies in true left main bifurcation lesions A prediction model of simple echocardiographic variables to screen for potentially correctable shunts in adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with atrial septal defects: a cross-sectional study

Clinical Trial2025 Nov 24;18(22):2701-2710.

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv . Article Link

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Small Vessel In-Stent Restenosis: A Subgroup Analysis of the AGENT IDE Randomized Trial

J Wen, S Dohad, R Shlofmitz et al. Keywords: drug-coated balloon; in-stent restenosis; small vessel; target lesion failure; target lesion revascularization; uncoated balloon.

Abstract

BACKGROUD -  Treatment of small vessel (SV) coronary artery disease is associated with higher restenosis rates. Drug-coated balloons offer a promising treatment option for stent failure by delivering an antiproliferative drug and avoiding an additional metal implant. However, evidence supporting the use of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in SVs is limited.


OBJECTIVES - The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCB vs uncoated balloon angioplasty according to vessel size.


METHODS - AGENT IDE (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis) randomized 600 patients with ISR to treatment with PCBs or uncoated balloons (2:1). This prespecified analysis evaluated the treatment effect of PCBs in SV (reference vessel diameter [RVD] ≤2.75 mm) and large vessel (RVD >2.75 mm) ISR. The primary endpoint of 1-year target lesion failure (TLF) was a composite of target lesion revascularization, cardiac death, and target vessel-related myocardial infarction.


RESULTS -  Among 597 patients with known angiographic core laboratory-adjudicated vessel size, 56% had SVs (mean RVD 2.4 ± 0.3 mm) and 44% had large vessels (mean RVD 3.1 ± 0.3 mm). One-year TLF was 20.6% vs 22.6% in the SV vs large vessel groups, respectively (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.65-1.31; P = 0.65). PCBs were associated with a 39% relative reduction in TLF compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with SVs (17.7% vs 27.4%; HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.37-0.99) and a 43% reduction in patients with large vessels (18.4% vs 30.5%; HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.34-0.96). The benefits of PCB use remained consistent, irrespective of vessel size (Pinteraction = 0.88). None of the patients treated with PCBs experienced definite or probable stent thrombosis.


CONCLUSIONS -  This prespecified subgroup analysis demonstrates that angioplasty with a PCB was associated with consistently reduced rates of 1-year TLF compared with an uncoated balloon in both SV and large vessel ISR patients. (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis [AGENT IDE]; NCT04647253).


Copyright © 2025 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.