CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Scientific Library

Abstract

Recommended Article

Outcome of Applying the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial Comparison of Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery According to the Completeness of Revascularization in Severe Coronary Artery Disease: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, and BEST Trials Lack of Association Between Heart Failure and Incident Cancer Syncope After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Elevated Lipoprotein(a) in Familial Hypercholesterolemia and its Role in the Progression of Calcific Aortic Stenosis Genetics and Causality of Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Original ResearchVolume 74, Issue 4, July 2019

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Outcome of Applying the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction

R Twerenbold, JP Costabel, T Nestelberger et al. Keywords: 0/1-h algorithm; acute myocardial infarction; high-sensitivity cardiac troponin; outcome; rule-out; safety

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommends the 0/1-h algorithm for rapid triage of patients with suspected nonST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI). However, its impact on patient management and safety when routinely applied is unknown.

 

OBJECTIVES - This study sought to determine these important real-world outcome data.

 

METHODS - In a prospective international study enrolling patients presenting with acute chest discomfort to the emergency department (ED), the authors assessed the real-world performance of the ESC 0/1-h algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T embedded in routine clinical care and its associated 30-day rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (the composite of cardiovascular death and MI).

 

RESULTS - Among 2,296 patients, nonST-segment elevation MI prevalence was 9.8%. In median, 1-h blood samples were collected 65 min after the 0-h blood draw. Overall, 94% of patients were managed without protocol violations, and 98% of patients triaged toward rule-out did not require additional cardiac investigations including high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurements at later time points or coronary computed tomography angiography in the ED. Median ED stay was 2 h and 30 min. The ESC 0/1-h algorithm triaged 62% of patients toward rule-out, and 71% of all patients underwent outpatient management. Proportion of patients with 30-day MACE were 0.2% (95% confidence interval: 03% to 0.5%) in the rule-out group and 0.1% (95% confidence interval: 0% to 0.2%) in outpatients. Very low MACE rates were confirmed in multiple subgroups, including early presenters.

 

CONCLUSIONS - These real-world data document the excellent applicability, short time to ED discharge, and low rate of 30-day MACE associated with the routine clinical use of the ESC 0/1-h algorithm for the management of patients presenting with acute chest discomfort to the ED.