CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血管内超声指导

Abstract

Recommended Article

Coronary plaque redistribution after stent implantation is determined by lipid composition: A NIRS-IVUS analysis Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves clinical outcomes during implantation of both first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis Serial intravascular ultrasound assessment of very late stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent placement The Year in Cardiovascular Medicine 2020: Imaging: Looking back on the Year in Cardiovascular Medicine for 2020 in the field of imaging are Fausto Pinto, José Luis Zamorano and Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci. Judy Ozkan speaks with them In-stent neoatherosclerosis: a final common pathway of late stent failure Optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound assessment of the anatomic size and wall thickness of a muscle bridge segment Novel predictor of target vessel revascularization after coronary stent implantation: Intraluminal intensity of blood speckle on intravascular ultrasound IVUS Guidance for Coronary Revascularization: When to Start, When to Stop?

Original Research2015 Aug;19(16):3012-7.

JOURNAL:Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. Article Link

The impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance during drug eluting stent implantation on angiographic outcomes

Yazici HU, Agamaliyev M, Aydar Y et al. Keywords: IVUS guided PCI; DES; outcome; minimal luminal diameter; net acute gain

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVE - Major limitation for the use of stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease is development of stent restenosis. The impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance during drug eluting stent (DES) implantation is presently not yet well established.


PATIENTS AND METHODS - For the present study, we included 30 patients who received DES with IVUS-guided stenting (Group A) and 30 patients receiving the DES without IVUS-guided stenting (Group B). The patients were evaluated for their ninth month control angiographies and were followed during two years for the development of relevant clinical events after the DES implantations. The angiographic and clinical results were compared between the groups.


RESULTS - After the percutaneous intervention, the minimal luminal diameter and net acute gain were significantly increased in Group A in respect to Group B (3.3 ± 0.34 vs. 2.8 ± 0.33, p < 0.01). Moreover, the rate for performing post-dilatation following stent implantation was higher in Group A than in Group B (p = 0.01). By contrast, stent restenosis rates were similar between the groups (p > 0.3).


CONCLUSIONS - The present results indicate that the use of IVUS for the implantation of DES can increase the success rate of the intervention. The IVUS guidance during DES implantation can be complementary percutaneous intervention, in particularly by detecting the situations that need for post-dilatation.