CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

充血性心力衰竭

科研文章

荐读文献

Mechanical circulatory support devices in advanced heart failure: 2020 and beyond A Fully Magnetically Levitated Circulatory Pump for Advanced Heart Failure Rationale and design of the comParIson Of sacubitril/valsartaN versus Enalapril on Effect on nt-pRo-bnp in patients stabilized from an acute Heart Failure episode (PIONEER-HF) trial Association Between Functional Impairment and Medication Burden in Adults with Heart Failure Rationale and design of the GUIDE-IT study: Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Frequency, predictors, and prognosis of ejection fraction improvement in heart failure: an echocardiogram-based registry study Is Cardiac Diastolic Dysfunction a Part of Post-Menopausal Syndrome? Baseline Features of the VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) Trial The year in cardiology: heart failure: The year in cardiology 2019

Clinical Trial2020 Aug 8.

JOURNAL:Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. Article Link

Metformin Lowers Body Weight But Fails to Increase Insulin Sensitivity in Chronic Heart Failure Patients without Diabetes: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

AH Larsen, H Wiggers, Niels Jessen et al. Keywords: HF; hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp; Insulin sensitivity; metformin

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE - The glucose-lowering drug metformin has recently been shown to reduce myocardial oxygen consumption and increase myocardial efficiency in chronic heart failure (HF) patients without diabetes. However, it remains to be established whether these beneficial myocardial effects are associated with metformin-induced alterations in whole-body insulin sensitivity and substrate metabolism.


METHODS - Eighteen HF patients with reduced ejection fraction and without diabetes (median age, 65 (interquartile range 55–68); ejection fraction 39 ± 6%; HbA1c 5.5 to 6.4%) were randomized to receive metformin (n= 10) or placebo (n= 8) for 3 months. We studied the effects of metformin on whole-body insulin sensitivity using a two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp incorporating isotope-labeled tracers of glucose, palmitate, and urea. Substrate metabolism and skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiratory capacity were determined by indirect calorimetry and high-resolution respirometry, and body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis. The primary outcome measure was change in insulin sensitivity.


RESULTS - Compared with placebo, metformin treatment lowered mean glycated hemoglobin levels (absolute mean difference, − 0.2%; 95% CI − 0.3 to 0.0;p= 0.03), reduced body weight (− 2.8 kg; 95% CI − 5.0 to − 0.6;p= 0.02), and increased fasting glucagon levels (3.2 pmol L−1; 95% CI 0.4 to 6.0;p= 0.03). No changes were observed in whole-body insulin sensitivity, endogenous glucose production, and peripheral glucose disposal or oxidation with metformin. Equally, resting energy expenditure, lipid and urea turnover, and skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiratory capacity remained unaltered.


CONCLUSION - Increased myocardial efficiency during metformin treatment is not mediated through improvements in insulin action in HF patients without diabetes.


CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION - URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02810132. Date of registration: June 22, 2016.