CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Scientific Library

Abstract

Recommended Article

Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis With Drug-Eluting Balloons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Stretch-induced sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium leak is causatively associated with atrial fibrillation in pressure-overloaded hearts Mechanistic Biomarkers Informative of Both Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review Apolipoprotein A-V is a potential target for treating coronary artery disease: evidence from genetic and metabolomic analyses Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in cancer patients treated with oral anticancer drugs Trends in Usage and Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Atherectomy: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry Pathophysiology, diagnosis and new therapeutic approaches for ischemic mitral regurgitation Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion during Cardiac Surgery to Prevent Stroke

Review Article2018 Oct;30(10):360-366.

JOURNAL:J Invasive Cardiol. Article Link

Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis With Drug-Eluting Balloons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liu S, Worme M, Bagai A et al. Keywords: ISR; drug-eluting balloon; drug-eluting stent; in-stent restenosis

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DEB) for the treatment of drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR).


METHODS - A comprehensive literature search was performed. The primary outcome was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target-lesion revascularization (TLR) at longest available follow-up (range, 12-36 months). Outcomes for DEB vs balloon angioplasty (BA) and DEB vs DES were analyzed separately using a random-effect Mantel-Haenszel model, as per an a priori protocol.

 

RESULTS - The study cohort comprised 1526 patients (746 DEB, 537 DES, 243 BA). DEB was associated with lower composite outcome compared with BA alone (19% vs 47%; risk ratio [RR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.84; P=.02), driven primarily by lower TLR (17% vs 34%; RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95; P=.03), with no difference in death or MI. There was no difference in the composite outcome between DEB and DES (20% vs 17%; RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.82-1.74; P=.35); DEB was associated with higher TLR (17.4% vs 11.3%; RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.08-2.03; P=.01), but lower all-cause mortality (2.2% vs 5.7%; RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.82; P=.01), with no difference in MI or stent thrombosis.

 

CONCLUSIONS - DEB was associated with a lower TLR rate than BA alone, but associated with a higher TLR rate than implantation of another DES. However, additional DES use was associated with an increase in mortality, a finding that requires further investigation.